SOBRE A "TÊNUE" DISTINÇÃO "CIÊNCIA E PSEUDOCIÊNCIA"

 

"Este livro argumenta que, ao compreender as doutrinas que muitas vezes são vistas como antitéticas à ciência, podemos aprender muito sobre como a ciência operava no passado e hoje."

...

"On the Fringe explores the philosophical and historical attempts to address this problem of demarcation. This book argues that by understanding doctrines that are often seen as antithetical to science, we can learn a great deal about how science operated in the past and does today."

______.

Link: 

https://history.princeton.edu/about/publications/fringe-where-science-meets-pseudoscience

Para saber mais:

GORDIN, Michael. On the fringe: where science meets pseudoscience. OUP, 2021. 

HANSSON, Sven Ove. Belief Change: introduction and overview. Springer,  2018.

______. Vetenskap och ovetenskap. Stockholm: Tiden, 1983.

______. “Defining Pseudoscience”, Philosophia Naturalis, 33: 169–176. 1996.

______. “Falsificationism Falsified”, Foundations of Science, 11: 275–286, 2006.

______. “Values in Pure and Applied Science”, Foundations of Science, 12: 257–268, 2007.

______. “Philosophy in the Defence of Science”, Theoria, 77(1): 101–103, 2011.

______. “Defining pseudoscience and science”, pp. 61–77 in Pigliucci and Boudry (eds.), 2013.

______. Philosophy of pseudoscience: reconsidering the demarcation problem. University of Chicago Press; Illustrated edição, 2013.

KANT, Immanuel. Crítica da razão pura. 3. ed. Lisboa: Fundação Calouste Gulbekian, 1994.

KUHN, Thomas S., 1974. “Logic of Discovery or Psychology of Research?”, pp. 798–819 In: P.A. Schilpp, The Philosophy of Karl Popper, The Library of Living Philosophers, vol xiv, book ii. La Salle: Open Court.

LAKATOS, Imre, “Falsification and the Methodology of Research program”, pp 91–197 In: Imre Lakatos and Alan Musgrave (eds.) Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1970.

______. “Popper on Demarcation and Induction”, pp. 241–273 In: P.A. Schilpp, The Philosophy of Karl Popper, The Library of Living Philosophers, vol xiv, book i. La Salle: Open Court, 1974a.

______. “Science and pseudoscience”, Conceptus, 8: 5–9, 1974b.

_____. “Science and pseudoscience”, pp. 114–121 In: S Brown et al. (eds.) Conceptions of Inquiry: A Reader London: Methuen, 1981.

LAUDAN, Larry, 1983. “The demise of the demarcation problem”, pp. 111–127 In: R.S. Cohan and L. Laudan (eds.), Physics, Philosophy, and Psychoanalysis, Dordrecht: Reidel.

POPPER, K. Lógica da pesquisa científica. São Paulo: Edusp, 1993.

______. Conjecturas e refutações. Trad. Bath S. Brasília: UB, 1972.

______. Os dois problemas fundamentais da teoria do conhecimento. São Paulo: Editora Unesp, 2013.

______. O conhecimento e o problema mente-corpo. Lisboa: Edições 70, 2009.

______; ECCLES, J. C. O cérebro e o pensamento. Campinas, SP: Papirus; Brasília, DF: Ed. Universidade de Brasília, 1992.

______. O conhecimento objetivo. Belo Horizonte, MG: Itatiaia, 1999.

______. O eu e seu cérebro. Campinas, SP: Papirus; Brasília, DF: Ed. Universidade de Brasília, 1995.